Wednesday, May 2, 2012

A universal digital library is within reach - Los Angeles Times Op-Ed

A universal digital library is within reach 

Copyright law poses considerable challenges, but any barriers to mass digitization of the world's books can — and should be — overcome. 

 by Pamela Samuelson, May 1, 2012 Los Angeles Times Op-Ed

"Since 2002, at first in secret and later with great fanfare, Google has been working to create a digital collection of all the world's books, a library that it hopes will last forever and make knowledge far more universally accessible.

But from the beginning, there has been an obstacle even more daunting than the project's many technical challenges: copyright law..."


Pamela Samuelson is a professor at the UC Berkeley School of Law and faculty director of the law school's Berkeley Center for Law and Technology.

Supporting Readings for Breakout Sessions - LAUC Assembly - May 10, 2012


Supporting Readings for Breakout Sessions:
Next Steps for Planning for Future Librarianship
Thursday, May 10, 2012
University of California, Santa Cruz Extension Silicon Valley
2505 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054


Next Generation Technical Services website

NGTS Background

UC Libraries Systemwide Operations and Planning Advisory Group (SOPAG)

NGTS Organizational Structure

Committee on Professional Governance Final Report 2010

LAUC Assembly blog entries for

Berkeley 2009
            Discussion Points and Outcomes

Irvine Regional 2010
Summaries from the LAUC 2010 Southern Regional Meeting

Santa Barbara 2011
            Breakout Sessions


Brian Matthews' White Paper "Think Like a Startup: A White Paper to Inspire Library Entrepreneurialism" has topics that will tie in with the May 10 LAUC Assembly discussion on next steps for planning for future librarianship.
A snippet from the paper:
“The media and pop culture provide us with romanticized visions of dorm room ideas becoming billion dollar IPOs. And indeed, that does happen sometimes, but startups are more than rags to riches stories. In concise terms: startups are organizations dedicated to creating something new under conditions of extreme uncertainty. This sounds exactly like an academic library to me. Not only are we trying to survive, but we’re also trying to transform our organizations into a viable service for 21st century scholars and learners.”
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/18649 with link to pdf of report

Breakout Sessions: Next Steps for Planning for Future Librarianship


Breakout Sessions: Next Steps for Planning for
Future Librarianship
Thursday, May 10, 2012
University of California, Santa Cruz Extension Silicon Valley
2505 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054

ReadyTalk
[Please use the regular Access Code: toll-free number 866-740-1260
and, when prompted, enter the access code 8249732#]

[For web content, log into http://www.readytalk.com/ and
in PARTICIPANT box, enter the access code 8249732#]
For assistance during the Assembly: 949-278-8263
Support through AIM chat:  UCILibkaned


“I want to use breakout sessions at the Assembly because past Assembly evaluations have asked for more participation by the assembled group.  This is an opportunity for LAUC members on their home campuses to participate in the Assembly as the event is happening.  If we can't reach a conclusion about all the discussion items suggested by the Breakout Session on the Future of Librarianship, then at least we can have a closing arc to the discussions that began at the Berkeley Fall Assembly 2009 and through Irvine Regional Assembly 2010 and Santa Barbara Assembly 2011. 

How do we leverage our training and experience as librarians in order to take advantage of this new organizational structure?

I'm concerned that not only do we lose the knowledge base but also the skills are missing when librarians retire or leave the University of California.  We do not have to resolve these issues at the Assembly, but I have asked the Committee on Professional Governance to facilitate discussions on the campuses, the results of which will be added to the final CPG report.  We will continue to use the blog entries for this feedback as well.  It is a bit ambitious to try to have both on-site and remote participation at the Assembly, but Assemblies may look like more and more like this in the future.”

Mitchell Brown
LAUC President 2011/2012

M.     Breakout Sessions on what are the next steps for planning for future librarianship.
The session will follow on the discussion from campuses on librarian attributes from the Committee on Professional Governance Final Report 2011.  Librarians talk about what they want to be doing/or think they should be doing in the future and more specifically how they plan on actually doing these activities to support the initiatives of the UC Libraries and the University.  How can we mobilize the “skills” identified for the next generation of academic librarians and how do they plan on acquiring these skills?  On the job training, mentoring, recruitment, collaboration with other institutions with specialized knowledge and expertise [both with and outside of UC]
i.         Shared Service Models
ii.       Lighting Teams – The New Working Model?
iii.      Communications Models
iv.     Training and New Skills


LAUC Committee on Professional Governance
Suggestions for Questions/Discussion points for LAUC Assembly, Santa Cruz
May 10, 2012


Breakout Sessions with Next Generation LAUC Members

 Librarians talk with next generation librarians about what they want to be doing/or think they should be doing in the future and more specifically how they plan on actually doing these activities to support the initiatives of the UC Libraries and the University. What “skills” will the next generation of academic librarians need for the 21st Century and how do they plan on acquiring these skills? On the job training, mentoring, recruitment, collaboration with other institutions with specialized knowledge and expertise [both with and outside of UC]

Your group will have 35 minutes to discuss one of the topics listed below.  Each group will have a designated note taker and a group facilitator.  At the end of the discussion period, each group will then have 3 minutes to report to the Assembly a brief summary of the group’s discussion and/or highlight one or two significant points made by the group.  The notes as well as a list of participants will be collected by the facilitator and submitted to both the LAUC Secretary for the official minutes of the Assembly and to the Committee on Professional Governance for further analysis. 


i.            Shared Service Models

Concrete suggestions on how to keep pace with ever-increasing user expectations in an era of shrinking resources and budgets (and maybe personnel).

Collections & Scholarly Communication

Concrete suggestions for maximizing the collections of all the UC libraries in the future – which assumes we will never again have the funding we need – and which assumes librarians will be making tough choices every day.


ii.            Lighting Teams – The New Working Model?


Working with smaller teams with a smaller project focus for quicker results?

Can we leverage work on different committees to support planning across the state?

Concrete suggestions for project team structures, projects, or management styles that worked well (examples)?


iii.            Communications Models

To which new groups should UC libraries be reaching out with communication models – and to what end? What are the gains broader communication?

iv.            Training and New Skills

Give some examples of successful training initiatives, at your institution or elsewhere. What do they do and how is their success measured?

OR

What are the advantages of different training models and to what extent should UC librarians be directing their own local professional training?


Details for Meeting Discussions

Facilitator:
1.       Solicit participation from all team members
2.       Keep your colleagues at the table focused on task
3.       Help the table to synthesize individual responses into a collective response
4.       Shift conversations away from unproductive tangents back onto main topic(s)
5.       Encourage quieter group members to participate
6.       Ask probing questions as necessary
7.       Paraphrase what people say to make sure you understand their main points
8.       Redirect the group if the discussion goes off‐track
9.       Encourage divergent views
10.    Keep track of time

General Ground Rules for all participants
1.       Speak openly and honestly
2.       Listen carefully to what others have to say
3.       Treat everyone with respect
4.       Keep comments brief and to the point
5.       Stay on task

Note Takers
1.       helps capture and track the key points throughout the discussion
2.       assists in the group prioritization process
3.       identifies each of the top points with some sort of star or similar indicator
4.       assists table facilitator


Technical requirement for the ReadyTalk sessions


The technical requirement for the ReadyTalk sessions are:
  • phone line, with analog or digital for audio
  • For web access, a computer with wireless or Ethernet connection.
  • For group viewing, a digital projector.
The session will run like a webinar, such as the session from CRL, NISO or WebEx.  There is no VOIP option for ReadyTalk so the audio portion will not be carried through the web connection.
Feedback from the divisions can be shared through chat in the web access or through the conference call. 

Complete list of system requirements   

Operating Systems
Supported Browsers
Presenters
Participants
Microsoft Windows
XP, Vista & 7 (32 and 64 bit)
Internet Explorer
(6.0+, 7.0+, 8.0+ 32-bit*)
Firefox
(3.6+)
Chrome
Java
1.3.1+ recommended
Flash 9.0.115+
OR
Java 1.3.1+
Apple Macintosh: OSX 10.5+
(Intel-based processors)
Firefox
(3.6+)
Safari
(5.0+)
Chrome
Java
1.3.1+ required
Flash 9.0.115+
OR
Java 1.3.1+
Linux 2.6+ kernel
32 and 64 bit; x86 CPU required
Firefox
(3.6+)
Chrome
Java
1.3.1+ recommended
Flash 9.0.115+
OR
Java 1.3.1+
Apple iPad: iOS 4.3+
(iPad, iPad 2)
n/a
n/a
ReadyTalk Mobile
for iPad app